You are viewing the translated version of प्रशासकीय रेखदेख, नियन्त्रण र निर्देशन.
Rule 9
Administrative supervision, control and direction
(1) The District Public Prosecutor's Office subject to this regulation shall be under the administrative supervision, control and direction of the Associate Attorney or District Attorney of that office.
(2) District Public Prosecutor's Office and High Public Prosecutor's Office shall be under the administrative supervision, control and direction of the Associate Attorney of the High Public Prosecutor's Office.
(3) The Office of the Special Public Prosecutor shall be under the administrative supervision, control and direction of the Associate Attorney of that office.
(4) All public prosecutors' offices shall be under the general administrative supervision, control and direction of the office of the Attorney General.
(5) Accounts responsible officer and administrative head of the Attorney General's office shall be the responsibility of the most senior departmental head.
(6) The Office of the Attorney General shall inspect and monitor all the Public Prosecutor's Offices and the High Public Prosecutor's Office at least once a year of the District Public Prosecutor's Office within their territorial jurisdiction.
(7) Inspection and monitoring according to sub-rule (6). The public prosecutor shall disclose the following matters and submit a report to the Attorney General's office:- (a) Whether the relevant public prosecutor's office has done the work with due diligence or not,
(b) Prosecution in a criminal case, whether or not the prosecution has been properly evaluated after the evidence found in the investigation,
(c) If the case has been partially prosecuted, whether the information has been sent to the Office of the High Public Prosecutor and the Office of the Attorney General in accordance with the instructions received or not,
(d) - Whether or not the necessary vigilance has been shown in the proceedings related to the filing of the case, the submission of witness evidence and affidavits, arguments and appeals,
(e) Whether or not the edited work is qualitative and realistic (f) Whether or not the requested legal opinion is provided on time, (g) Whether or not the monthly and annual reports are sent in the prescribed format and on time,
(h) Subordinate Governments"Proper control and supervision" of lawyers and other employees,
(i) Accounts and financial related operations _ Whether or not they are in accordance with economic laws and regulations and whether the relevant documents are kept correct or not,
(h) Whether action has been taken according to the instructions of the Attorney General or higher office or prior inspection,
(T. Missile, records of files, law books and Nepal Law Gazette kept up-to-date or not,
(T. Actions related to information technology are done on time or not,
(d) management of victim friendly cell and victim friendly behavior or not,
(d) whether the coordination committee meeting was held at the scheduled time or not, (n) whether the circulars and instructions issued by the higher office were followed or not,
(T) According to the prevailing law: Whether or not the action to be edited has been performed.
(8) According to sub-rule (7): Based on the report received, if it is found that the public prosecutor or employee of the concerned public prosecutor's office has not performed the required work or has been negligent in performing the work or has acted in a bad manner, such public prosecutor or employee will be subject to departmental action according to the prevailing law.